Cover

Latest issue

volume 67, number 10, October 2014

Defined by our hierarchy? How hierarchical positions shape our identifications and well-being at work
Kate E Horton, Charlotte R McClelland, and Mark A Griffin

‘I wish I had…’: Target reflections on responses to workplace mistreatment
Denise Salin, Aino Tenhiälä, Marie-Élène Roberge, and Jennifer L Berdahl

Who is ‘the middle manager’?
Nancy Harding, Hugh Lee, and Jackie Ford

Writing materiality into management and organization studies through and with Luce Irigaray
Marianna Fotaki, Beverly Dawn Metcalfe, and Nancy Harding

Negative emotions in informal feedback: The benefits of disappointment and drawbacks of anger
Genevieve Johnson and Shane Connelly

Latest news


Reviewer of the Year Award 2014

Huge thanks and warm congratulations go to Penny Dick (University of Sheffield, UK), who is our winner this year. Read more about the Reviewer of the Year Award and view past winners.


Paper of the Year Award 2013

Click here to find out who won and to gain free access to all winning articles - past and present!


Click for more news...



Free access content


Classic papers from Human Relations
Paper of the Year Award winners
Papers that have influenced the Editor
Vodcasts and podcasts and featured articles
Sample online issue

This month's free access article
Talking work in a bank: A study of organizing properties of leadership in work interactions
Magnus Larsson and Susanne E Lundholm
Human Relations 2013; 66 (8): 1101–1129
DOI: 10.1177/0018726712465452
This article will be free to access until 31 October 2014.


Have you signed up for OnlineFirst email alerts?

Readers and authors alike are encouraged to sign up for OnlineFirst email alert options, ensuring immediate notification each time a paper is published online first, ahead of allocation to an issue. Email alerts are also available for ongoing journal tables of contents and for alerts by author name and keyword.

Visit http://online.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts to sign up!


Human Relations is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for journal editors.